点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“空中老虎”白尾海雕在北京平谷金海湖冬捕******
被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物白尾海雕近日在北京市平谷区金海湖畔捕食。 索丹罗珠 摄
中新网北京1月6日电 (马平川)在北京市平谷区金海湖畔，摄影、观鸟爱好者们近日首次观测到了被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物——白尾海雕，并且捕捉到两大两小一家四口精彩的捕食的画面。
被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物白尾海雕近日在北京市平谷区金海湖畔捕食。 索丹罗珠 摄
“这次发现了四只白尾海雕，两只成年大雕，两只3—4岁的小雕。”野生动物摄影师索丹罗珠告诉记者，白尾海雕捕食会在低空盘旋，发现鱼后缓速下降，接触水面一刹那会迅速将利爪伸入水中抓住猎物。白尾海雕喜欢在近水开阔空旷的草甸、沼泽等环境觅食活动，通常是单只或成对觅食，多只汇聚捕食较为罕见。
被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物白尾海雕近日在北京市平谷区金海湖畔捕食。 索丹罗珠 摄
白尾海雕是大型猛禽，因尾羽呈楔形，为纯白色而命名，已被列入《世界自然保护联盟》(IUCN)濒危物种红色名录，属国家一级保护动物，通常活动在海拔高度为2500-5300米的地方。
被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物白尾海雕近日在北京市平谷区金海湖畔捕食。 索丹罗珠 摄
白尾海雕对迁徙地有着严格的要求。这次白尾海雕现身平谷区金海湖，且能够集群出现，充分说明近些年当地生态环境的持续向好，也反映出近年来平谷区在加强生态保护、污染治理等方面的措施效果显著。
被誉为“空中老虎”的国家一级保护动物白尾海雕近日在北京市平谷区金海湖畔捕食。 索丹罗珠 摄
白尾海雕出现的平谷金海湖是国家四A级景区，位于北京市平谷区城东18公里处金海湖镇上宅村南，水域面积6.5平方公里。气候宜人，自然生态优越，三面环山、多水汇聚，是一个“望得见山、看得见水”的宜居康养之地。景区西依金海湖大坝，三面环水，三面青山环绕，四面飞檐明柱，有四季分明的湖光山色，有湖光塔、金花公主墓、望海亭、锯齿崖等数十处自然景观、人文景观。2021年，金海湖地区成功举办世界休闲大会。
另据了解，在白尾海雕之前，2022年1年中，“水中大熊猫”桃花水母、“鸟中大熊猫”震旦鸦雀等珍稀生物和鸟类相继现身平谷，致使平谷生物多样性不断丰富，生态底色愈发靓丽。
野生动物摄影师索丹罗珠冒严寒在北京金海湖畔自制的隐蔽帐篷里“潜伏”拍摄。 本人供图
野生动物摄影师索丹罗珠介绍，为了解更多不同鸟类，拍摄到精彩画面，他冒着严寒已经在金海湖畔自制的隐蔽帐篷里“潜伏”了40多天，除了白尾海雕，还拍到了国家一级保护动物黑鹳，国家二级保护动物雕鸮、秋沙鸭、猎隼、游隼、白尾鹞，以及红嘴蓝雀、雀鹰等各种小林鸟。现在一个地区逗留、栖息的国家一级、二级野生保护动物种类和数量多少，正在成为很多人评测这个地区生态价值和重要性的显性衡量指标。白尾海雕族群式出现在金海湖，既证明野生动物正在回归城市，也反映出平谷区作为首都生态涵养区的生态价值正在显现并大幅提升。
野生动物摄影师索丹罗珠冒严寒在北京金海湖畔拍摄。 本人供图
好生态就会有好风景，有好风景的地方一定会有新经济。平谷区在第六次党代会上明确提出，在拥抱新消费新生活、打造世界休闲谷的进程中，期待更多保护动物栖息安家平谷，也期望更多的生态环境建设者、更多的游客和更多的爱鸟拍鸟人士走进平谷，体验平谷的生态美。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
彩票快三地图 |
)